“Tweety”
Last modified: October 31, 2006
It's
now about two years since I finished Tweety, and I still like its sound. And
therefore I might not have had the desire to enhance its performance if not
at some moment a few weeks ago I found out that one of the the big Jensen capacitors
at the output was leaking oil. Now that was an unpleasant surprise. And I needed
to replace both capacitors as I did not have another blue cap, only two yellow
jensens of 0.33uF. Hmm, this gave me a reason to make modifications to the RIAA
circuit of Tweety as well. As shown on the RIAA
background page for Tweety, the modified values for the filter would bring
Tweety withing 0.1dB of the ideal curve, which is about 10 times better than
the original version. Therefore, I changed the 120k resistor for 105k, the 10k
resistor for 11k, and the capacitor of 8.2nF for 7.2nF. Well, this last value
is not a standard capacitor value, but by putting two caps of 3.3 and 3.9 nF
in parallel, we obtain the desired value.
This
is a copy of the figure of page 4 of that RIAA background article. Clearly shown
if that both calculation and simulation of the new RIAA filter for Tweety improves
the response a great deal over the original chart.
This is the photo of the new guts of Tweety.
I should have known that the canary needed yellow caps instead of blue ones.
Don't know why I ever tried the blue ones. Hmm, I'll have to wait a few days
before being able to judge the sound of Tweety. Not that I think that the new
filter makes a large difference for the sound as far as we'll be able to hear,
it's just that it's much more accurately following the RIAA curve.
Anyway, should you have the Blue Jensen caps yourself, be careful and check
these caps for leaking once in a while. I read about this problem before on
the web, so apparently I'm not the first and only person where this problem
is occurring. If you want to stay on the safe site, use Auricaps, they're dry
and very very good.
|
<< Back to Tweety (page 3) |
© Maarten&Annemarie, October 2003, 2006